Video scenes shots:
Watch the video:
| URL: | |
| Embed: |
Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment
Other videos by this author:
 |
7. Reversing Vascular Aging | Mini Med School Posted by: StanfordUniversity
Video duration: 3931 seconds Related: N/A Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
Latest comments made on this video:
By: grunder20. on 22 Dec 11, 09:55:21
Being irrevocable as it is, global warming? can be stopped.
By: grunder20. on 24 Nov 11, 15:28:41
Complicated!?
By: thetricon69. on 18 Nov 11, 03:07:38
A policy must be? absolute.
By: question279. on 02 Feb 10, 11:08:19
Global warming is not a concern for humanity. The concern should be more about the GLOBAL GREEDY. The fear of climate change is only a political mouth wash, such a thing as saving the planet. If you have compassion? for this planet, you should concern for other species that would survive after human extinction. The collapse of ecosystem is neccessary for human termination. Planet rejuvenate itself. Sooner human extinction arrive, this planet and other? species would be at peace.
By: FrankRizzo6662. on 09 Jan 10, 00:03:37
Global warming is BS, money making scam. Our carbon footprint changes the? climate in a very VERY small fractional amount. Wacko's and left wing idiots are the only ones pushing this BS agenda
By: madashelldude. on 13 Dec 09, 05:44:37
You are confusing economic growth? with emission growth. In fact it is possible to use 100% green energy with no environmental footprint and manufacture everything from electronic components to building materials using microorganisms. Google Angela Belcher, Richard Smalley or nanotechnology.
By: polyzygote. on 13 Dec 09, 05:18:06
you assume wrong. he calls for economic? growth. just watch the video again.
By: madashelldude. on 13 Dec 09, 04:17:45
where is he "calling for more growth"?! I? assume you mean more CO2 emissions?! he says the exact opposite.
By: polyzygote. on 13 Dec 09, 02:08:05
if you were interested in? real solutions he wouldn't call for more growth. very simple.
By: madashelldude. on 12 Dec 09, 19:05:24
Like with everything in science SO2 based solutions need to be quantified and tested. He is not proposing geo engineering for simply mitigating the symptoms he? is proposing it to keep us alive and buy some time for real solutions. SO2 will start to react with O3 and albeit is not as potent as CFCs it took us a few decades to damage the ozone layer with CFCs. So SO2 could buy us some time. If during those decades we don't get rid of all the extra CO2 we are in big trouble when we turn off SO2
By: mi8nu7by6. on 02 Nov 09, 23:00:48
Retnuh1974, if you are curious about why scientists are concerned about the difference between the? expected natural climatic cycles and what we are actually experiencing, I suggest reading theIPCC AR4 Working Group 1- Physical Science Basis Report. It is available for free online- and while it will take a while to read, it may help you understand why there is a concern.
By: polyzygote. on 30 Oct 09, 18:10:24
he is for economic growth? has he thought for a minute what that actually means? his solution is continued growth with geo-engineering to mitigate the symptoms of that growth. or, the pop? a pill mentality, instead of addressing the cause of ill health. climate change is only one of the many problems. solutions to which will need to be holistic and well integrated. continued economic and population growth are at the heart of the problem, but these subjects are still taboo. we're in deep shizuo.
By: stopglobalwarming08. on 30 Oct 09, 10:42:23
global warming is mostly man-made....according to ALL MAJOR SCIENTIFIC INSTITUTIONS ignore the Right-Wing/Oil trolls? and their brainwashed sheep cap and trade will help our world, but not the Right-Wing and Big Oil
By: Retnuh1974. on 30 Oct 09, 03:31:30
Yeah, but this has happened many times before, that is why I am wondering why it has gotten a big response now. Over the billions of years this Earth has been around it has changed regardless of humans. We are? going to change the Earth whether we want to or not. However the Ice Age and the thawing had nothing to do with us, yet it happened; right? The worst part is still to come; Carbon taxing. Carbon Taxing seems unfair due to us not having a way to really correct our footprint.
By: wildguido. on 30 Oct 09, 03:17:51
It is troubling because of the estimates that the warming will cause frozen ice to melt? causing sea levels to rise.
By: Retnuh1974. on 30 Oct 09, 00:34:40
Global Warming and Global Cooling are natural phenomenons,? so why does the public get so upset about Global Warming?