Video scenes shots:
Watch the video:
| URL: | |
| Embed: |
Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment
Other videos by this author:
![The Gathering Of Christ In Atl [Pt. 1/13] 06/09](http://img.youtube.com/vi/zoSIjvj2uuc&feature=youtube_gdata/2.jpg "The Gathering Of Christ In Atl [Pt. 1/13] 06/09") |
The Gathering Of Christ In Atl [Pt. 1/13] 06/09 Posted by: manuppowerup
Video duration: 549 seconds Related: N/A Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
Latest comments made on this video:
By: ib5995. on 09 Feb 12, 07:35:27
Question 5bg7r41 can you count to 7 and do you know what that means? Why not title this 30 unreasonably long essays that no one should answer? Why not just start out with "can you predict the future" so everyone will know what a waste of? time you are? Why shouldn't everyone just flag you for misleading text?
By: iamsdeathgod. on 05 Feb 12, 16:02:44
fine the...where does? god come from?
By: lonewolfpsg1. on 01 Feb 12, 19:10:36
Arguing with theist is like? butting heads against a brick wall.
By: briiecheeseful. on 29 Jan 12, 22:25:11
hi, small comment about your "up" point. you cannot arbitrarily designate any direction you choose as up. saying that you can becuase "no one can know" what direction up is is simply false based on the definition of up in the english language which is "upward from the ground". that is? all
By: dimitrhil. on 28 Jan 12, 06:05:20
@naturalistmind It doesn't work like that, it's "the bible is true because god says so, i know god is the creator of the universe because the bible says so...and how do i know that this is true? oh right, because the bible says so....Repeat until complete? brainwash of oneself."
By: CrimsonVoid. on 26 Jan 12, 22:35:04
Oh, I forgot to mention. It has been shown that matter does actually create itself. All you have to do is read up on quantum physics. If you choose not to it's not my fault that you? don't understand. However, it isn't 100% infallable, but as I said earlier, that doesn't exist so you might want to reword your questions.
By: CrimsonVoid. on 26 Jan 12, 22:31:56
These questions have always confused me. Congratulations, you have come up with some questions that cannot be answered. My question to you is: why does it matter? You seem to think that not knowing is some horrible thing that will cause people to suddenly give up on? what we know to be true because there are things that we can only speculate about. Why do so many people not realize that it doesn't matter. Also, there is no such thing as 100% proof. That's why science is maliable, it accepts that.
By: DayDreamAscent. on 26 Jan 12, 13:04:43
Anyone? that is 100% convinced there isn't a god has deigned himself to BE god, since he has the answers to everything. And that's almost as dangerous as religion.
By: colouredmirrorball. on 21 Jan 12, 15:28:23
7: I'm not a biologist so I can't do that. Nobody can give you 100 % proofs but I'm sure there are some clever biologists out there that can give you the 99.99999... % valid experimental results. But signs of evolution are everywhere and? you'd have to be blind to not see them. There, filled in your comment section with answers to your questions. Stupid 500 character limit...
By: colouredmirrorball. on 21 Jan 12, 15:24:22
Believing the Bible is just plain silly. It states that the Earth is flat. Everyone who has been into space knows this isn't true. That's one example of many. All of science is based on assumptions. But at least it is based on verifiable assumptions? and repeatable experiments and not on a 2000 year old fairy tale book, full of untrue facts.
By: colouredmirrorball. on 21 Jan 12, 15:18:59
6A: To some extent. If I bring two charges next to each other I can predict how they will interact. But I can't predict the future of all particles in the universe since calculating that would require more? matter than there is in the universe. 6A-A and B: Science is able to predict the future because of our observations. We make laws that make sense and that predict the behaviour of particles. That's how we predict the future with our five senses.
By: colouredmirrorball. on 21 Jan 12, 15:12:31
6 (cont): Each time science discovers something, it explains a phenomenon that people? used to explain with a theistic theory. You are now doing the same: using the big bang as evidence for the existence of god (as people used to do with lightning and such) because we don't understand it yet. But as soon as science will be able to explain it you will either close your eyes for the explanation, shout it is wrong because it isn't 100 % or just find something else we don't understand yet.
By: colouredmirrorball. on 21 Jan 12, 15:05:29
6: There are lots of unknowns yet to be solved (aka "my future job"). These unknowns do not mean that god did it. People used to explain things they don't understand with a theistic explanation (for example lightning). Now we know lightning is just an electrostatic? discharge. Perfectly explainable. The unknowns of these days are in particle physics and astronomy. But explaining strange occurences by a god would be making the same mistakes as our ancestors.
By: colouredmirrorball. on 21 Jan 12, 15:01:53
5: The beginning of my theory can't be proven? Did you assume I couldn't provide any prove for the big bang? Naughty. You can be fairly certain the big bang has occured. It just takes me a few more years of education before I can show you better proof. I expect people to believe in the BB because it is the logical conclusion of our valid observations. So you don't take anything from science if it's proof is not 100 % valid but yet you? want to believe in the very unprobable existence of a god?
By: colouredmirrorball. on 21 Jan 12, 14:54:26
4A: depends on the movie. In my opinion this is a bad analogy. Math? is the only science with 100 % true proofs. All other sciences work with assumptions, but they are very probable (as in 99.99999... %). For example we are 99.9 % sure the Higgs boson exists but yet physicists don't want to annouce its discovery until we are 99.99999... % sure. (No numbers are exact, only an example from the top of my mind). Your statement that if something isn't 100 % true then it isn't science is false.
By: colouredmirrorball. on 21 Jan 12, 14:40:38
3B-A and B: We don't try to repeat the big bang so no one knows that answer. But if you see for example that the universe is expanding it is very likely it started at 'point zero' with a bang. 4: That is not how math works. How would you be able to start solving an? equation in the middle of the solving process? Either someone has made the first part of the solution or you have to make an assumption that is likely to be false. In the latter case your outcome will indeed be based on an assumption.
By: colouredmirrorball. on 21 Jan 12, 14:34:48
3A-B: No one was there at that point but evidence of this is? observable everywhere in the universe. 3A-C: I'm no expert at this but talk to an astronomer. I can think of that there is background radiation and the fact that the universe is expanding so if you reverse this process there has existed a point in spacetime where everything started. 3B: not sure if I understood this. Do you mean repeating the Big Bang?
By: colouredmirrorball. on 21 Jan 12, 14:28:52
3: "Do you believe a mass of matter and energy rotated until it exploded?" This question does not make sense at all... mass is a property of matter and not of energy. Does this question refer to the big bang? If so, there is no such thing as "until" it exploded. 3A: That can't be true. 3A-A: We know that the universe started with a big? bang but we don't know what happpened exactly since outside the universe there is no space or time.
By: colouredmirrorball. on 21 Jan 12, 14:23:22
1A-A: "can energy create itself?" Of course not, according to the first law of thermodynamics. 2: "Has matter always existed?" The same answer applies as to question 1 since energy and matter are related. 2A: matter can create itself out of energy and vice versa, but no matter or energy can suddenly appear out of nothing. 2A-A: matter gets transferred into energy in for example nuclear reactions. This energy,? in the form of other elementar particles, can form new matter.
By: colouredmirrorball. on 21 Jan 12, 14:18:12
I don't know if I should be replying to this since I'm only an undergraduate physics student so I might not have understood everything but here goes. 1: "Do you believe energy has always existed?" This is a tricky question since no definition? of "always" is given. We can be fairly sure that energy has existed from the Big Bang until now, and as time was created with the Big Bang there is no such thing as "before" the BB. 1A: See above, and also energy can not exist without matter as E=mc˛
By: Cdawg3x. on 18 Jan 12, 22:03:06
thank you for making us think!? Now your turn!......still waiting!!
By: hfurjiskkr5. on 18 Jan 12, 20:05:50
@Pelcurus? Thank you.
By: reaper4931. on 17 Jan 12, 22:28:34
give me 100%? non opinionated proof that god exists
By: fovlsbane. on 17 Jan 12, 18:20:19
Well if you want proof of evolution just read about dog-breeding.? takes about 15mins to see taht its real.
By: Pelcurus. on 17 Jan 12, 14:11:54
@hfurjiskkr5 I wish I could thumbs up a? comment more than once. I'd spend the next hour doing so.