Video scenes shots:
Watch the video:
| URL: | |
| Embed: |
Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment
Other videos by this author:
![\"Weapons of World War II\" 4 of 40](http://img.youtube.com/vi/blnW388y9mo&feature=youtube_gdata/2.jpg "\\"Weapons of World War II\\" 4 of 40") |
"Weapons of World War II" 4 of 40 Posted by: KoLo2071
Video duration: 601 seconds Related: N/A Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment |
Latest comments made on this video:
By: 181stTIE. on 08 Feb 12, 10:37:21
Cheese eating surrender monkeys?
By: rawdawg15. on 17 Dec 11, 10:53:59
thanks?
By: French4thcommando. on 28 Oct 11, 01:49:17
So many people here need to read a real history book, coloring books and? crayons do not count.
By: lucius1976. on 17 Jun 11, 17:13:54
@gopconservative78 And finally 4. after the war: Write the history books in such way that you rescued all? other and did all the important fighting.
By: lucius1976. on 17 Jun 11, 17:12:04
@gopconservative78 The Rules of? American Warfare: 1. Wait until the other war parties exhaust themselves out. If that has happend 2. Join the war and fight the enemy. If you encounter to much resistance then 3. Dig in and call in the air force
By: lucius1976. on 15 Jun 11, 18:04:35
The picture at 05:27? is not Walter von Brauchitsch but Ewald von Kleist
By: Rico8458. on 26 Mar 11, 00:43:54
ther germans had too many military genius in the High Command at that time. ? too much brain power compared with french and british.
By: gopconservative78. on 12 Feb 11, 21:29:36
The Rules of French Warfare: 1) Can't be led by a Frenchmen 2) Americans do all the? fighting (DeGualle syndrome) 3) When 1 and 2 fail find the nearest German and surrender
By: NoXAdmiral. on 08 Sep 10, 14:44:32
the fall of france is due to weak commanders. a? strong commander can win any war.
By: Narjoso. on 08 Jun 10, 14:19:56
@Cytacon thats true, if france had been? more aggresive and launch an assult on germany when they invaded Poland ww2 would have been stopt before it had the chance to begin
By: Cytacon. on 10 Apr 10, 20:10:04
France would have been a formidable foe? if it was not led by a bunch of incompetent imbeciles.
By: rangerbobcat. on 11 Mar 10, 18:48:58
@randy109 Because all the superiority faded as the war went on. Allied air forces overwhelmed the Luftwaffe. Other armies copied German tactics. Allied nations became united against Germany. And there were more soldiers and more industrial potential on the other side of the table. And the? damn fool declared war on the US when it wasn't necessary. As someone has pointed out already the Japanese had not attacked the Russians
By: Rico8458. on 28 Feb 10, 05:23:03
too many panzers? and not enough bombers and fighters
By: hitlerjorge. on 10 Feb 10, 02:42:04
no, there defeat, is? having an ally that does NOT attack the damn oil fields and mines of Siberia, Japan
By: peanutpumpgun. on 24 Jan 10, 10:08:52
Hitlers NO RETREAT orders was the biggest mistake, Stalin Learned it after first having done the same as hitler. In my opion another great failure of the germans was their Airpower, Goering was not the Right commander also they? lacked a heavybomber in large enough numbers to kill Britain . Due to their tactic of blitzkrieg their airforce was not fit to fight an airbatle like that over england, German airforce was setup as infantrysupport, not strategig bombing in large scale.
By: peanutpumpgun. on 24 Jan 10, 10:01:30
Vell the failure of germany, was hitler! demanding again and again that the army should fight to the last man slowly killed the might of the german army, also Hitler did not listen to the commanders and constantly changed their strategies. Also The Italian army and all its failures probaly used up german men and material needed elsewhere to secure? victories. All in All Hitler actually lost the war for germany , In my opion anyway.
By: randy109. on 21 Jan 10, 11:27:01
Cont- Germany, being superior in equipment, training and tactics still missed some key points. Most of the world? feared them which bonded the Allies. Germans had far less natural resources and were grossly outnumbered in personnel AND skilled laborers. Germany was fighting a "World War" and didn't have a substantial surface naval fleet. Germans couldn't control the Airspace. Germany's enemies had moral superiority uniting them. Germans were VASTLY deficient in numbers, thus dooming them.
By: randy109. on 21 Jan 10, 11:13:54
I've spent 35+ years studying WW2 and key points that keeps returning are;? Germany had better soldiers. Germany had better weapons (except for Naval). Germany had better tactics that worked well in the "reality" of war in the field. German people were almost single minded supporters of Hitler and the party. Germans had superior propaganda and made brilliant use of the media and the culture of the time. All said, Germany was superior almost across the board. Why wasn't that enough to win??
By: peri2502. on 19 Jan 10, 17:46:58
@Fridomfry The Maginot Line? was considered a failure by many after the warm when in fact it wasn't. It held up well in the areas it was located, but even the strongest fortress is useless if you leave the back door open
By: jakefree25. on 31 Dec 09, 20:55:52
@asku23 The Germans were better soldiers, and had better gear & training! As well as for the last 2.5 years of the war,duing the greatest battles, she was fighting on the defense. So I am not surprised at the loss ratios, especially versus the Soviets who threw? their people & soldiers away like cattle
By: AppleSouffle. on 31 Dec 09, 20:26:07
I agree, you made a great point. And I think you'll be amused? to learn that the one time that Adolf visited Paris, he and some of his officers were standing in front of the Eiffel Tower. I'm sure you've seen the pictures. Some French men had disabled the elevators before they left. Upon being told he would have to climb the stairs in the famous Eiffel Tower, Adolf said it was too much trouble and he stayed on the ground. What a wimp. I learned that from a children's book on Gustave Eiffel.
By: AppleSouffle. on 14 Dec 09, 05:21:43
Supposedly the Aryans have blond hair and blue eyes,? but those are both recessive traits. I would hardly say those are the qualities of some so called master race.
By: Fridomfry. on 17 Nov 09, 22:31:24
In 1914, in the Ardennes, the French attacked the Germans - while they should have done better by using the Ardennes defensively. The 4th French army fell back only because it became outflanked, as the German main attack came from the North. Yet the German army suffered heavy losses there. For the rest, you are right. It's a typical case of success based on "chosing the difficult path, where? the enemy does not expect you".
By: jakefree25. on 16 Nov 09, 05:06:48
the whole aryan concept was such a joke, but they believed that the original Aryans came from Tibet. There was a movie, "7 Years in Tibet" that concerned the Nazi expedition to TIbet that? got stranded there during the war.
By: dmkavidelly. on 16 Nov 09, 04:41:32
That and the Iranians are the real? Aryans. :p